10 biggest OSHA fines of 2019

Very last year, 9 of the most costly OSHA citations bundled some kind of slide defense violation, no matter if the firm in problem primarily done roofing or combined asphalt. The tenth primarily dealt with excavation and trenching violations. 

It truly is effortless to understand why these inoculations warranted the maximum penalties, as they are amid the most unsafe actions that can occur on a design task. In actuality, falls constituted extra than 33% of all design deaths in 2018. In addition, four of the 10 most-cited OSHA violations are relevant to falls.  

Shawn D. Purvis/Purvis Household Advancement Co. Inc. – Saco, Maine

Full proposed fines: $one,792,726

Position: Violations below contest (in this article and in this article)

OSHA proposed the biggest total fines in 2019 for contractor Purvis Household Advancement Co. in June 2019. One particular quotation was for $one,116,476 for violations on a position in Portland, Maine, exactly where an personnel fell 20 toes to his dying. The other quotation, this just one totaling $676,250, was for violations on a position in Previous Orchard Beach front, Maine, just after OSHA acquired a complaint. The particular person who died when on the Portland position was climbing down from a roof with no the advantage of slide defense. 

OSHA issued Purvis just one repeat, 13 willful and a few severe violations, just about all of them dealing with slide defense and some others relevant to scaffold staying positioned to shut to electric power strains and failure to give correct experience and eye defense.  

In Might 2019, Purvis pleaded not guilty to place of work manslaughter costs and awaits demo.

T.D. Fraley & Sons — Alexandria, Virginia

Full Proposed Fines: $528,692

Position: Violations below contest

Virginia Occupational Protection and Wellness (VOSH), which oversees an OSHA-accepted condition plan, issued Fraley twelve violation citations just after just one of its workers was hospitalized when breaking down scaffolding that was positioned far too shut to an overhead electric power line and the employee came into get in touch with with the dwell line. VOSH also uncovered that scaffolding mounting as higher as 20 toes experienced been positioned on blocks and boards alternatively of on secure floor and footings there had been insufficient scaffolding guardrail units and that Fraley authorized its workers to do the job in 10 toes of electric power strains.

On inspection, VOSH investigators uncovered that scaffolds mounting fourteen toes to 20 toes higher had been staying supported applying blocks and boards alternatively of sound and degree footings that scaffolds experienced insufficient guardrail units that Fraley authorized workers to do the job in 10 toes of an overhead higher voltage electric power line and that Fraley did not get in touch with VOSH about the employee’s personal injury and hospitalization in the necessary 24-hour timeframe.

Crown Roofing LLC — Sarasota, Florida  

Full proposed fines: $462,579

Position: Violations below contest (in this article, in this article and in this article)

OSHA has inspected Crown Roofing projects just about 20 situations in the previous 5 years and has cited the firm many situations as a outcome of individuals inspections. In 2019, Crown gathered citations symbolizing $462,579 in proposed penalties — $132,598 for violations on a task in Naples, Florida, $132,598 for a task in Port Saint Lucie, Florida, and $197,383 for another task in Naples. The wide greater part of the citations are relevant to slide defense. 

In a June 2019 neighborhood media report on businesses that are battling OSHA fines, a representative from Crown Roofing claimed that the firm presents its workers with security equipment and teaching — about $one million in 2018 — but that some workers will not abide by the regulations the firm has established forth.

Allways Roofing — Snohomish, Washington

Full Proposed Fines: $374,400

Position: Violations Underneath Contest (in this article and in this article)

The Washington Office of Labor & Industries (L&I), which, like Virginia, also operates a federal OSHA-accepted condition plan, cited Allways Roofing previous November for violations on two projects — just one in Woodinville, Washington ($191,seven-hundred) and the other in Arlington, Washington ($182,seven-hundred). The greater part of the 18 citations deal with slide defense, while there are some that deal with other security breaches like failure to carry out frequent inspections. Allways’ functioning conditions on the Arlington position prompted neighbors to call and report the firm.

L&I has cited Allways for slide-relevant and other security violations seven situations since 2012 and has positioned the contractor into Washington’s Significant Violator software. 

Frame Q — Palisades Park, New Jersey

Full Proposed Fines: $261,451     

Position: Shut

OSHA cited and proposed fines for Frame Q in January 2019 just after an inspector uncovered slide defense violations on just one of its projects.  

Shortly just after the U.S. Legal professional for the District of New Jersey filed match versus the firm in an attempt to accumulate extra than $678,000 of previous-because of OSHA fines, some dated as significantly again as 2014. Individuals citations had been also primarily slide-relevant. As of February 2019, individuals citations included up to $473,178 additionally $173,one hundred in penalties and fascination. Frame Q, according to OSHA information, contested at least just one quotation and connected good, but that claim was turned down just after the firm missed the deadline for submitting a dispute.  

Prosecutors dismissed that situation with no prejudice in Might 2019. There is no cause given for the dismissal in the court docket files, but Frame Q could have arrived at a settlement with the federal authorities. 

Nelcon Inc. – Kalispell, Montana

Full Proposed Fines: $261,418

Position: Penalty payment plan in position (in this article and in this article)

OSHA issued Kalispell, Montana-based mostly freeway contractor Nelcon Inc. two fines totaling $261,418 — just one for $225,425 and the other for $35,993 — previous year just after just one personnel fell 15 toes and a few other workers had been burned at a Nelcon cell asphalt mixing crops in Laurel, Montana. OSHA claimed the accident was a outcome of pouring cooler oil into a warm oil tank.

The 32 violations that OSHA issued to Nelcon bundled failure to report a do the job-relevant accident main to hospitalization in 24 hours and failure to handle dangerous electrical power.

Nelcon arrived at a settlement with OSHA that lessened the $261,418 good to $184,209 and the $35,993 good to $26,412.

Polo Masonry Builders Inc. — Park Ridge, Illinois

Full Proposed Fines: $252,136

Position: Violations Underneath Contest

OSHA cited Polo Masonry Builders Inc. for not protecting its workers from slide and scaffolding dangers on just one of the firm’s business projects in Chicago. The company positioned Polo in its Significant Violator Enforcement Plan just after a long line of inspections uncovered very similar violations. 

Throughout a March 2019 jobsite inspection, OSHA inspectors claimed that Polo’s workers had been uncovered to the risks of improperly produced scaffolding falls of extra than 19 toes simply because of edges left unprotected by guardrails. 

Polo has contested the $252,136 of fines and all citations.

Mike Krueger (roofing contractor) — Martin, Ohio

Full Proposed Fines: $247,544

Position: Penalties Referred to Credit card debt Selection (in this article and in this article)

OSHA has citing roofing contractor Mike Krueger 5 situations since 2008 for slide defense violations. Throughout the previous two planned inspections in Might 2019, OSHA inspectors identified that Krueger experienced violated slide defense criteria and other OSHA restrictions at two Ohio jobsites ​— one in Toledo and the other in Perrysburg. OSHA fined Krueger $116,688 for violations at the Toledo website and $one hundred thirty,856 for violations at the Perrysburg website. 

OSHA has referred individuals fines to financial debt collectors. 

Northridge Construction Corp. — East Patchogue, New York

Full Proposed Fines: $224,620

Position: Violations below contest

When OSHA inspectors visited Northridge Construction Corp.’s jobsite in East Patchogue, New York, subsequent a fatality, they identified that just one of Northridge’s workers experienced fallen from a ladder onto a concrete floor and sustained fatal head injuries. OSHA fined Northridge $224,620 for a few willful and a few severe violations that bundled failure to give head defense for workers and letting them to do the job on surfaces that could not hold their fat.

Northridge’s violations are below contest. 

R.V. Wagner Inc. — St. Louis, Missouri

Full Proposed Fines: $212,158

Position: Pending Penalty Payment

OSHA inspectors cited St. Louis, Missouri-based mostly civil, business and industrial contractor R.V. Wagner Inc. previous year with exposing workers to trench, excavation and other dangers when workers had been putting in concrete stormwater pipes. The company proposed fines of $212,158 for four severe and two willful violations.

Throughout the inspection, inspectors uncovered that the firm experienced not offered protective helmets to its personnel did not defend workers from struck-by dangers when they had been functioning in an excavation authorized workers to do the job when hundreds of components had been lifted more than their heads and other excavation-relevant violations.​

Close